Wednesday, 29 July 2015


HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL SITUATIONS DURING THE COMPOSITION OF SASTRA TEXTS OF SAIVA SIDDHANTHA:



The period between 3rd BCE and 3rd CE  is known as the sangam age. The sangam age did not have an exclusive saivite activity. Saivam was one of the several religions like Jainism, Buddhism, vaisnavism,  saktham, kaumaram, animism, and many primitive cults.
Image result for sangam age

After this there was a Jain rule in tamilagam. The rulers were  called as “kalabrahs”. They ruled up to the late 5th century CE. Some of the sangam  and kalabrah age artifacts and structures  still survive in the coastal village poompuhar  (nagapatnam district)  today. It was a Jain phase of tamilagam.




There was a definite jain-buddhist deconstruction that took place in tamilagam (present day tamilnadu, Kerala and northern srilanka)in 6th century.  Saivism replaced most other religions by force during the period from 6th century CE.. Jain monasteries were destroyed.  There was hegemony of saivam, patronized by the rulers. It caused a lot of hatred among other sects towards saivam. The period from the 6th   to 8th century CE  Pallavas (பல்லவர்)ruled cholamandalam.
Image result for pallavar history


 The imperial cholas ruled most of the tamilagam  from 9TH  till 13TH  century CE. It was the age of Saiva devotional hymns and the thirumurai (Saiva renaissance period). This period saw the elevation of saivam as a dominant sect in tamilagam[i].

Thirumanthiram, which is a work based on Siva agama was written in 5th century. It contains many of the earliest rituals and its practice. The Thevaram sung by appar, sambandhar and sundhararar were  compiled by Nambiyandar Nambi in 11th century. Thiruvasagam written by manikavasakar was added to this list.
Image result for 12 thirumuraigal


Last thirumurai  was Periapuranam by Sekkizhar of 13th  century. The twelve thirumurais  were anthologized at this period . The 63 nayanmars  and 9 thogai-adiyars (தொகையடியார்)(community of saints) were  canonized. Temple constructions achieved its peak during this period.

Image result for 63 nayanmars

PAUCITY OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE THIRUMURAIS:


The thirumurais were by and large used for the propagation of saivism . They do have  philosophical insights into saivism. But  much of the content of the core metaphysical issues of gnana kandam of the agamas are exclusively studied in the siddhantha sastras only. The periya puranam is the life stories of 63 nayanmars and 9 groups of adiyars. Even though the metaphysical aspects have not fully blossomed in the thirumurais, the thirumandhiram contains most of the  reflective aspects of siddantham -among the thirumurai texts.


 Any general onlooker of siddhantham would be first charmed by the sheer number of verses in the thirumurais (more than 10,000).  Almost all the murai texts are (samhithas)prayer songs.   To see the reflective aspects one has to go to the sastra texts. The development of sastra texts even though happened in 5-6th centuries itself, they were not elevated to a sanctified status till 12-13th centuries. Let us see this now.


In the end of 13th  century the cholamandalam (Cauvery delta) was beginning to see the decline of IMPERIAL CHOLAS(சோழர்). The advent  of Pandyas  from Madurai led to complete fall of cholans.  This period saw the  forming monasteries in the Cauvery delta in order to preserve the theological literature and schools of thought.


The Saiva savants acquired liberal land and temple administrative rights from the rulers.The philosophical  tenets have become adequate and Saiva religion was firmly  established in south India and northern srilanka. This was the period when most of upper India was in instability. But in southern India  it was an era of growth and consolidation of Hinduism. Scholars worked to compile the “metaphysical treatises” into a formal anthology[ii].


Meykandar of pennagadam settled in Chidambaram, finalized his seminal work SIVAGNANABODHAM.(சிவஞானபோதம்). His disciples Umapathi, Maraignanam and Arulnandhi namely in succession followed his mission. The 14 sastra texts were canonized into “Meikanda sandana texts”. (மெய்கண்ட சந்தானங்கள்).


The Thiruvaduthurai adheenam was first established after this period, and it was followed by the other Saiva monasteries along the Cauvery river banks like the dharumapuram adheenam and the panandhal kasi madam.



Subsequent political changes lead to power vacuum for about a century.  The Vijayanagar Empire occupied cholamandalam in 14th  century. They had appointed nayakars (governors) to rule their territories in southindia. Tanjore was one such nayak. They were telugu-vaishnavites. However the monasteries continued to get patronage. The fall of nayakars led to a brief Marathi interlude in the 17th century. This  did not disturb savite traditions and siddhantha works. Temple constructions and siddhantha philosophy were encouraged by this Hindu rulers.

Image result for nayakkar

They were followed till  the  European missionaries  came to  Tanjore  by 1700AD.  There were a few noteworthu Christian scholars who admired saiva texts and religion like                           Bartholomaus Ziegan Palk[iii] and G.U.Pope.Thus this region had an unique oppurtunity for preserving the saivite heritage continuously for two milleniam.


Hence forth from 19th century we find a decline in orthodox saivite studies and religion. There were more liberal and humanistic schools[iv] like the one started by Ramalinga vallalar are seen (SAMARASA SATHYA SUDDHA SANMARGAM) சமரச சத்திய சுத்த சன்மார்க்கம்.


The religious practice was hugely influenced by the developments in the world as a whole. But the saiva tradition is nowhere well guarded in the world than in tanjore district[v]. Now these saiva traditions need scientific interpretations in the light of modern developments in neuro-science and psychology.




 






[i] K.A.N. Sastri, A History of South India, OxfordUniversityPress (1955)
[ii]  Nilakanta Sastri, K.A. (1984). The Colas. Madras: University of Madras.
[iv] Humanism is a group of philosophies and ethical perspectives which emphasize the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers individual thought and evidence (rationalism, empiricism), over established doctrine or faith (fideism). The term humanism can be ambiguously diverse, and there has been a persistent confusion between several related uses of the term because different intellectual movements have identified with it over time. In philosophy and social science, humanism refers to a perspective that affirms some notion of a "human nature" (contrasted with anti-humanism). In modern times, many humanist movements have become strongly aligned with secularism, with the term Humanism often used as a byword for non-theistic beliefs about ideas such as meaning and purpose. Nicolas Walter's Humanism – What's in the Word (London: Rationalist Press Association, 1997 ISBN 0-301-97001-7).
[v] Michael wood, documentary:story of india(part –iv:ages of gold) BBC  productions, London.

AGAMA AND THEIR EVOLUTION:


The agama tradition in Saiva-Hindu philosophy is an independent school. It is possible it has its own origin in Mesopotamia and Indus valley.  Early agama texts were orally transmitted. They may have been in a proto Dravidian form. Its arrival to tamilagam and subsequent growth into proto-Tamil agamas is still shrouded in mystery.

Image result for mesopotomia religion






There are references to such existence of agamas in the early Tamil texts like sangam poetries. The early Tamil agamas had four sections namely Aram (ethics), porul (logic), inbam (aesthetics) and veedu (metaphysics). (அறம்,பொருள், இன்பம்,வீடு).

Image result for agamas in tamil


The early agamas were later sanskritised. The Sanskrit phase saw the growth of agamas from a single book to about nine books by 5th century AD. The sadasiva agama of thirumoolar is the Tamil version of the nine Siva agamas.


The Siva agamas then grew into 28 and there were 250 odd upa-agamas(sub-books). There were vaisnava agamas and saktha agamas too. The jains also had agamas. The agamas do not acknowledge the Vedas as primary. They hold to the thanthra tradition while Vedas to manthra tradition.

Image result for agamas in tamil


Vedas are cosmocentric and the agamas ontocentric.  That is Vedas hold to Brahman while the agamas to the jeevan.  The Vedas revere the “parama” the agamas revere the “citha”. The citha in Tamil is siddha.  The knowledge became siddhantham (SIDDHA-ANDHAM).(சித்த- அந்தம்)[i].

The Vedas, Jain agamas and the proto-Dravidian Siva-agamas are a triad of mutually benefiting system of thoughts often opposed to each other[ii]. Violent clashes between Jainism and sidhantham  were seen in the south in 4-5th CE. Agamas were lost in north india due to lack of patronage from kings and later due to foreign invasions from 8th century.


The agama tradition now by and large confined to the tamilagam in India. The agama texts are now available in olai-suvadees (palm leave manuscripts) and are kept as secrets. A few books have come out and a website devoted to the Siva agamas also have come[iii].


The agama tradition which gave rise to the siddhantha tradition needs more exploration and their true originality has to be brought out.

Image result for dhakshinamoorthi







[i] Vedanta is a dominant Indian philosophical system. There are three influential Vedanta schools. They are Advaita Vedanta of Sankara, Visishdatvaita Vedanta of Ramanujar, and Dvaita Vedanta of Madvar. Generally, Vedanta, in modern days, refers to Sankarar’s Vedanta. According to this system, and even Visishdatvaita, God or Brahmam  is the only reality. Soul is one and it broke away from Brahmam. Maya caused this breaking away. (Maya in Vedanta is different from that in Sidhanta). The world is an illusion and a reflection of Brahmam. The soul takes various forms in various bodies, and joins Brahmam when it gains Gnanam or divine bliss. What is the necessity for the soul to break away from God? If maya is the cause of it, is not maya more powerful than God? If the soul is part of Brahmam, then every man should have the divine qualities. Is he having it? Even if the soul unites with the God at the end, what is the guarantee that it will not break away again? Such questions do not get satisfactory answers. Saiva Siddhanta, therefore, does not accept such vedantic views.    K. Ganesalingam, Notes on Saiva Siddhanta Philosophy http://www.saivaworld.org retrieved on 11.2.2013.
[ii]  Budhist and Jain philosophies adopt sense perception and inference to establish their views. Saiva Siddhnta considers scriptural authority, in addition to them.They do not believe in the existence of God. But Budha and Aruga are worshipped as Gods. Saiva Siddhanta believes in One God who is Siva. Their concepts regarding soul and liberation are entirely different from those in Siddhanta. Both philosophies believe in karmic theory, but they hold the view that God is not required to make the karma reach the doer. According to Saiva Siddhnta, Karma is an unintelligent entity and requires a higher power, God, to enable it to reach the doer. K. Ganesalingam, Notes on Saiva Siddhanta Philosophy http://www.saivaworld.org retrieved on 11.2.2013.

https://saivaexegesis.blogspot.com/ see my new blog