PART-9: COSMOGONY: CREATION OF UNIVERSE:

 

9.1:UNMAI VILAKAM:

UNMAI VILAKAM is a book written by Thiruvadhigai Manavagangadanthar. His book is an important resource for the understanding of the concepts of creation and thathva and thaveehas. We shall see them now.

 

When the destruction of the universe takes place all matters perish. This is sangaaram. This sangaaram leads to creation of the new universe afresh by the Siva.

 

The Siva creates Maya first. In the Maya the Siva stand without any other malam and this state is called SUDDHA MAYAM. சுத்த மாயம்

1.When he combines the gnana power of his grace with the Maya the NADHA TATHVAM emerges.நாத தத்துவம்

2.When he combines his kiriya power with the suddha maya the VINDHU THATHVAM emerges. விந்து தத்துவம்

3.When he mixes the nadham and vindhu with the  suddha maya the SADHAKIYA THATHVAM emerges. சதாக்கியதத்துவம்

4.When the kiriya power exceeds and gnana power decreases they mix with suddha Maya upon which the MAHESWARA THATHVA emerges. மகேஸ்வரதத்துவம்

5. When the gnana exceeds and kiriya decreases the SUDDHA VIDDHYA THATHVAM emerges.சுத்தவித்தியாதத்துவம்

 

Thus five thathvas emerging from the suddha Maya is known as the SIVA THATHVAM

The Siva thathvas are the

Nadham, Vindhu, Sadhakiyam, Maheswaram and Suddha viddhai

The thathvas later take the body form.

1.Nadham=sivam form

2.Vindhu=sakthi form

3.Sadhakiyam=sadhasivan form

4.Maheswram=mahesan form

5.Suddha viddhai=rudhran, maal and ayan forms

 

The nadham and vindhu have no form hence called ARUVAM(AROOPA)அரூபம்

The sadhasivan has a form less form and hence called ARUVURUVAM(AROOPA-ROOPA:LINGAM) அரூபரூபம்

The suddhaviddhai has a form hence called URUVAM(ROOPA)ரூபம்

 

The creation of the universe from maya is similar to the quantum theories, black hole theories and the dark force theories. Even now seventy five percent of the universe consists of dark matters and the universe is still evolving. Dark energy principles in physics are closer to the maya thathvam[i].

 

It is a philosophical speculation of a yester year, that surprises us when it happens to be true on an empirical modern validation. That is the beauty of the human reflective process.

 

 

---

[i] Dark Energy, Dark Matter http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/

In the early 1990's, one thing was fairly certain about the expansion of the Universe. It might have enough energy density to stop its expansion and recollapse, it might have so little energy density that it would never stop expanding, but gravity was certain to slow the expansion as time went on. Granted, the slowing had not been observed, but, theoretically, the Universe had to slow. The Universe is full of matter and the attractive force of gravity pulls all matter together. Then came 1998 and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of very distant supernovae that showed that, a long time ago, the Universe was actually expanding more slowly than it is today. So the expansion of the Universe has not been slowing due to gravity, as everyone thought, it has been accelerating. No one expected this, no one knew how to explain it. But something was causing it.
Eventually theorists came up with three sorts of explanations. Maybe it was a result of a long-discarded version of Einstein's theory of gravity, one that contained what was called a "cosmological constant." Maybe there was some strange kind of energy-fluid that filled space. Maybe there is something wrong with Einstein's theory of gravity and a new theory could include some kind of field that creates this cosmic acceleration. Theorists still don't know what the correct explanation is, but they have given the solution a name. It is called dark energy.
More is unknown than is known. We know how much dark energy there is because we know how it affects the Universe's expansion. Other than that, it is a complete mystery. But it is an important mystery. It turns out that roughly 68% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 27%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the Universe. Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn't be called "normal" matter at all, since it is such a small fraction of the Universe.
One explanation for dark energy is that it is a property of space. Albert Einstein was the first person to realize that empty space is not nothing. Space has amazing properties, many of which are just beginning to be understood. The first property that Einstein discovered is that it is possible for more space to come into existence. Then one version of Einstein's gravity theory, the version that contains a cosmological constant, makes a second prediction: "empty space" can possess its own energy. Because this energy is a property of space itself, it would not be diluted as space expands. As more space comes into existence, more of this energy-of-space would appear. As a result, this form of energy would cause the Universe to expand faster and faster. Unfortunately, no one understands why the cosmological constant should even be there, much less why it would have exactly the right value to cause the observed acceleration of the Universe. 
Another explanation for how space acquires energy comes from the quantum theory of matter. In this theory, "empty space" is actually full of temporary ("virtual") particles that continually form and then disappear. But when physicists tried to calculate how much energy this would give empty space, the answer came out wrong - wrong by a lot. The number came out 10¹²⁰ times too big. That's a 1 with 120 zeros after it. It's hard to get an answer that bad. So the mystery continues.
Another explanation for dark energy is that it is a new kind of dynamical energy fluid or field, something that fills all of space but something whose effect on the expansion of the Universe is the opposite of that of matter and normal energy. Some theorists have named this "quintessence," after the fifth element of the Greek philosophers. But, if quintessence is the answer, we still don't know what it is like, what it interacts with, or why it exists. So the mystery continues.
A last possibility is that Einstein's theory of gravity is not correct. That would not only affect the expansion of the Universe, but it would also affect the way that normal matter in galaxies and clusters of galaxies behaved. This fact would provide a way to decide if the solution to the dark energy problem is a new gravity theory or not: we could observe how galaxies come together in clusters. But if it does turn out that a new theory of gravity is needed, what kind of theory would it be? How could it correctly describe the motion of the bodies in the Solar System, as Einstein's theory is known to do, and still give us the different prediction for the Universe that we need? There are candidate theories, but none are compelling. So the mystery continues.
The thing that is needed to decide between dark energy possibilities - a property of space, a new dynamic fluid, or a new theory of gravity - is more data, better data.
By fitting a theoretical model of the composition of the Universe to the combined set of cosmological observations, scientists have come up with the composition that we described above, ~68% dark energy, ~27% dark matter, ~5% normal matter. What is dark matter?
We are much more certain what dark matter is not than we are what it is. First, it is dark, meaning that it is not in the form of stars and planets that we see. Observations show that there is far too little visible matter in the Universe to make up the 27% required by the observations. Second, it is not in the form of dark clouds of normal matter, matter made up of particles called baryons. We know this because we would be able to detect baryonic clouds by their absorption of radiation passing through them. Third, dark matter is not antimatter, because we do not see the unique gamma rays that are produced when antimatter annihilates with matter. Finally, we can rule out large galaxy-sized black holes on the basis of how many gravitational lenses we see. High concentrations of matter bend light passing near them from objects further away, but we do not see enough lensing events to suggest that such objects to make up the required 25% dark matter contribution.
However, at this point, there are still a few dark matter possibilities that are viable. Baryonic matter could still make up the dark matter if it were all tied up in brown dwarfs or in small, dense chunks of heavy elements. These possibilities are known as massive compact halo objects, or "MACHOs". But the most common view is that dark matter is not baryonic at all, but that it is made up of other, more exotic particles like axions or WIMPS (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).